What is “worker dividend” protected by the authorities?
The authorities is betting on ‘worker dividends’ to counter the results of inflation. “When dividends improve for shareholders, so should workers.”Summary of the President of the Republic, at the finish of October, throughout his participation in the program “L’Evènement” on France 2. During the election marketing campaign, in 2020, Emmanuel Macron was already supported (PDF) A binding gadget “Profit Sharing in Dividend Paying Companies”. So far with out success in motivating the social companions.
The authorities has since tried to revive the concept. “The finest sharing of worth have to be the chief undertaking of the majority”In an interview with the request of the Minister of Economy, Bruno Le Maire the parisian“Saturday, November 28. “Employee Dividends Benefit Everyone.” Bercy’s tenant thus needs to prepare a convention on this query in presence, at the starting of 2023 “Economists, Business Leaders, Employees” And “Opposition Parties”.
Labor Minister Olivier Duspot had already defined to franceinfo that the authorities would take motion “his accountability”If no settlement is reached later Three or 4 months. This paves the manner for a possible invoice. It stays to be seen on what foundation. In his election program, the presidential candidate mentions three choices: participation, profit-sharing and the Macron bonus.
Participation, a course of to redistribute earnings, is already necessary for corporations with greater than 50 workers It grants bonuses, the quantity of which is set by contract and can’t exceed 30,852 euros. Profit sharing, in the meantime, is an worker financial savings plan, which is dependent upon the firm’s outcomes and is not necessary. Finally, value-sharing bonuses (generally referred to as “Macron bonuses”) enable employers to pay tax-free bonuses to their workers.
inside the parisian, Bruno Le Maire didn’t specify the contours of this “worker dividend”, which should be outlined subsequent 12 months. On the different hand, this necessary course of, utilized to all SMEs, requires corporations to pay a portion of their web earnings to workers, in the event that they want to pay dividends to shareholders. Thibaut Lanxade, former vice-president of Meddef and creator of a 2019 report on worth sharing between corporations and workers, notably supported this proposition. “In phrases of type, worker dividends appear important to me.”Responded the president of CroissancePlus, a community that brings collectively greater than 500 entrepreneurs, to franceinfo.
But employers as we speak take a dim view of the proposal, decrying the mixture of genres. “This is a really dangerous expression which perpetuates the confusion between capital and labour.”Eric Chevy, vice-president of the Confederation of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (CPME) argues in the columns of the parisian. “Dividends come to reward risk-taking. And the idea ignores the actuality of an SME.” Still in the Ile-de-France every day, Medeff denounced “Confusion about the nature of risk-taking and contribution of workers and shareholders to worth creation by the agency”.
The proposal does not enchantment a lot to unions, which need wage will increase above all else. The chief of the CGT, Felipe Martínez, specifically, referred to as for a rise in the minimal wage and indexation of wages to inflation as an alternative. And a number of public service unions have additionally requested a revaluation of the index factors. “Our various is to not exchange wage with bonuses.”Commenting on his half Luke Matthew, National Secretary of CFDT, in the parisian.
>> FOUR QUESTIONS TO INDEX WAGE FOR INFLATION
However, the wage indexation choice was dominated out by the Elysee. During his look in France 2, Emmanuel Macron clearly rejected this risk, as a result of he believes that such a system would destroy. “lots of of 1000’s of jobs”. “Automatically growing all wages over inflation means growing all costs by the similar quantity with out finish”Commenting for his half Bruno Le Maire, consider that solely there shall be “Loser” In this inflationary argument.