The past year has been a frustrating one for college athletes as it has been a great success for college athletes. The combined effects of free refresher rules with new name, image, and similar rules have been creating something similar to the real job market, where players can easily change schools and earn money by selling their jobs. Players are not employees, and while NCAA regulations around NIL rules mean that someone pays them, players who are still being exploited head on are now as privileged as a class. This is probably why NCAA officials are forcing US lawmakers to maintain their legitimacy.
SEC Commissioner Greg Sankey and Pac-12 Commissioner George Kliavkoff traveled to Washington, DC on Thursday to present their case to a few U.S. senators. The copying work is in line with the formation of a NCAA team made up of college administrators, who made the first NIL regulations, say they will soon issue a warning to promoters, and “provide more guidance to member schools on what many administrators call ‘pay’. play NIL’s ‘secret secrets made by donors to create hope.’ The issue of concern for government officials and the working class is the same, that athletes and sponsors have created a lucrative market, while the wealthy, pro-affiliated promoters use the prospect of profit. of NIL to trick players into coming to the schools they support.
“I think it’s possible that in the end we will get government regulations on name, image and form,” Kliavkoff told ESPN, “and we want to discuss all the challenges that student athletes can face if they are considered to be.” That final gives the game a go, and he later said he would like to split the payroll of seven people so that it would not be made in a way to make any incentives, which is obviously not possible. “The amount of NIL payments should be related to the work done as a balance to ensure that we do not spend on incentives and payments,” he said, apparently unaware of any relationship between giving and wanting, or, consequently, a long-term history of pay incentives. playing under the table.
NIL’s integrated approach is transfer he can be very confusing: Representatives of Isaiah Wong have squeezed NIL’s better alliance out of a well-known campaign threatening to change its course. Said booster got a transfer KSU $ 800,000 Nijel Pack (including car). Three of the stars of St. Peters’ Elite Eight runs were also relocated after their season. Wichita State has just sacked manager Darron Boatright among other things because his failure to pay players resulted in seven Shockers players being transferred from the program. From the point of view of things, something like Wong’s conversation or the Cinderella team’s arrogant arrogance or Botright’s shooting seems to be the result of an inappropriate advertising for college sports, the destruction of high moral standards and any idea of a positive continuation. about the cool idea of chasing a bag. Depending on how athletes feel, they may be able to raise money to buy their work instead of helping the NCAA make $ 1.15 billion for free. While you believe that the number of players has dramatically changed college games, any NCAA defense on its own merits will be waterproof, as no one is paid to work.
This market probably should controlled, and the only clear and fair way to resolve this conflict is for players to be active. Attempts to confuse promoters – who pay for player names, photos, and the like – when recruiting people are ineffective and actually disrupt the functionality that is being played here. The pursuit of emergency incentives, an essential part of recruiting people for school, and changing the cause altogether. Athletes are not changing schools because violent gangs are abusing the rules that once allowed local sandwiches to benefit the basketball team or whatever; athletes are changing schools because it makes sense. This redesigned form of NIL power retains NCAA power over its players, even though the role seems unlikely.
The turmoil in the advertising market cannot be said for players who want to repay their debts by helping their coaches earn eight pay. All of this confusion is with the NCAA in an attempt to maintain the stability of the anti-corruption system for a much longer period of time than is legal. One hopes that a corrective request would lead the body to seek help to find the right and obvious answer, which is the only way to “correct” a business that was built behind unpaid work is to destroy the companies. This is very difficult to ask for a big organization like the United States Senate, but even so, it is hard to imagine players going along with the return of their potential to be paid now that all of this money is flying in the open. There is still much to be done, though I think we should take it as a good sign that the NCAA leadership thinks all of this is so dangerous that it needs to ask for help.