Torres and Serie C: Teramo and Campobasso rejected by Tar

It began round 9 o’clock this morning, August 3, the final assembly of Tar of Lazio which can result in choices on T’s complaintseramo and Campobasso, not included in latest weeks in Covisoc and truthful play to participate within the subsequent Lega Pro. Fermanalike a lowered membership Series Cand the second is Torresfirst among the many certified gamers of the Serie D groups. Below are the updates from some of the necessary days in Sassari’s latest historical past.

13.30 – A heat remark by President Torres, Stephen Udassi to our microphone: listed below are his phrases

13.06 – Below for many who desire a hyperlink to Tar’s doc on the judgment regarding Campobasso: Click right here

13.03 – In the passage of Tar doc associated to the rejection of the Campobasso firm says: “Considering: a) that the applicant isn’t admitted to the competitors of Serie C based mostly on the invention of the success of the ritual that was left – on the date of the interval offered by the explanatory guidelines – within the obligation to pay the next money owed: 03 /08/22 , 13:01 N. 08990/2022 REG. RIC. 4/6 – VAT ensuing from periodic funds associated to the second a part of the 2021 tax interval; – VAT ensuing from periodic funds associated to the third a part of the 2020 tax interval; – VAT ensuing from periodic funds associated to the second a part of the 2019 tax interval; b) that particularly stated tax money owed have turn into a matter of analysis in automated management carried out in accordance with talent. 54-bis of Presidential Decree No. 633/72, the place communications unrelated to the Agency had been despatched to the corporate. of Money, which the corporate didn’t observe both by the complete fee of the cash that ought to be paid after receiving the identical or by implementing correctly and rapidly the schedule of installments offered by the artwork. 3-bis of Legislative Decree 462/97, for instance, by paying the quantity of the primary installment inside the interval established by regulation; c) which should be ignored, inside the limits of the information of the protection of fumus boni
judges, the criticism of the plaintiff was supposed to assist – briefly – after the implementation of quick taxes earlier than the deadline of twenty-two June 2022 for the fee of the installments due on 31.5.2022 with the primary consolidation of the Revenue Agency; d) that, to start with, authorized measures that improve the necessity for ensures on the premise of the institution of
The Authorizing Manual, which refers back to the regularity of the relative paperwork and on the deadline: this serves to make sure the graceful working and the orderly begin of the competitors in accordance with the time restrict; e) that on this case, the claims of the plaintiff searching for to boost the corporate’s tax from a wider perspective, in accordance with the date 31.5.2022, are sustainable contemplating that no indeniable circumstances emerge. from courtroom paperwork and 03 / 08/22, 13:01 N. 08990/2022 REG.RIC. 5/6 formally adheres to the Financial Administration to the half established by the applicant exterior the strict process talked about in artwork. 3-bis of Legislative Decree 462/97; f) that the completeness of the place of the applicant a
following the “spontaneous setting” can’t be discovered even within the interpretive approach within the sports activities context, as a result of this may create discrimination within the want for certainty that now we have already talked about.
secure; g) that the declare, made on its behalf, accepted by the applicant to the Serie D competitors after declaring the invalidity of Article 52, paragraph 10 of the NOIF, can’t be accepted, as a result of lack of curiosity of the get together. at this level, the household course of has not even began;
h) that there isn’t any longer any curiosity in proscribing, right here, the best way to launch gamers in accordance with artwork. 110 of the NOIF, a relative not taken by skilled sports activities organizations
measure; PQM The Regional Administrative Court of Lazio (Prima Ter Section) rejects the request for warning. They cost a payment for this defensive unit. This order might be issued by the Administration and might be submitted to the Secretariat of the Court who will notify it.
to events. He thought so within the council chamber of Rome on August 2, 2022

13.01 – The get together can begin in Sassari with the identical rossoblù membership that made it official again to the consultants on their social media

12.54 – Campobasso’s attraction can also be rejected: as a result of Torres is in Serie C

12.05 – Teramo after the elimination described by Tar will have the ability to play the cardboard of State Council, the final likelihood for civil justice, after the group has misplaced each aspect of sporting justice. In phrases of time, nevertheless, even after the victory in State College, the brand new season was created with out anticipating something new from the courts. Lega Pro after the ultimate choices of the Tar will make completely different groups tomorrow, August 4, the place 5 to 12 will begin making calendars once more.

11.57 – However, there isn’t any communication with the federal government from Teramo after the attraction was rejected by the TAR. Even Fermana didn’t clarify himself publicly

11.31 – Since the attraction was rejected Teramo and an hour and a half handed nevertheless, Tar didn’t present himself within the position of Campobasso. A tough scenario as described in the previous couple of days, however a harmful wait that Sassari is having fun with.

11.06 – Meanwhile Torres underneath the steering of Alfonso Greco continues to coach on his return to Arona the place market actions are persevering with: here is the most recent.

10.45An extended wait in comparison with Teramo in Campobasso’s choice was doable given the distinction in prices, and the ultimate membership in latest weeks appeared assured of a doable victory over the Tar. From what was gathered by our workers yesterday, the President of TAR himself gave lots of time and a number of inquiries to the corporate’s attorneys in regards to the paperwork that had been introduced to show the idea of Campobasso. Now we have to perceive whether or not Tar will violate the principles of truthful play or not.

10.30 – As said within the TAR doc, Torres attorneys who’re strictly following the judgments within the Roman places of work right this moment. Andrea Cossu and Nicola Carboni: “Torres Srl, – the doc reads – within the particular person of the authorized consultant professional tempore, represented and defended by the attorneys Andrea Cossu and Nicola Carboni, digitalized as PEC from the Registers of Justice and the designated space of ​​the workplace of Avv. Nicola Carboni in Sassari, by way of Armando Diaz, 6″.

10.25 – Below is the complete Lazio TAR doc whereas Teramo Calcio’s request is rejected: Here is the Document (click on to view)

10.22 – Teramo’s attraction is rejected confirms Fermana’s return to Serie C regardless of the final relegation, the membership from the Marches, as the primary within the group of groups of the final Lega Pro, solely wanted one attraction that was rejected between Teramo and Campobasso to return to the workplace among the many professionals.

10.20 – This is the checklist of Lazio TAR referees making choices: President Francesco Arzillocouncilor Rosa Perna, referendum Matthias Viggiano.

10.00Teramo’s request was deniedwhich won’t take part within the subsequent Serie C. As said within the letter from Lazio TAR: “The Regional Court of Lazio (Prima Ter Section) rejects the protection request. They cost a payment for this defensive unit. This order might be administered by the Administration and might be submitted to the Secretariat of the Court who will notify it.
to events. He thought so within the council chamber of Rome on August 2, 2022“.

Roberto Pinna

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.