Soccer

three questions about the partnership signed between France and Qatar to guarantee the security of the World Cup

After the Senate in February, the National Assembly in flip ratified the settlement between Qatar and France. Signed in March 2021 in Doha by then-Prime Minister Edouard Philippe, this partnership embarrassed the opposition, which opposed the authorities with the deaths of employees on the development websites of Qatar’s stadiums.

>> 2022 World Cup in Qatar: behind the model new stadiums and metro, exploited employees… and some social progress

What does the settlement present?

The textual content “goals to present a excessive degree of security for the 2022 FIFA World Cup by technical recommendation and operational help actions”in accordance to its Article 1. It is obvious that that is primarily an change of expertise to guarantee the security of the 2022 World Cup.

In element, in accordance to the particulars given in the semi-cycle by the rapporteur of the textual content, Amelia Lacroffe, France will ship “21 devoted GIGN operators, 170 anti-drone operators, 10 demining operators, 10 explosive detection canine groups and 5 to 8 consultants supplied by the National Anti-Hooliganism Unit (DNLH)” for basic “about 220 French consultants”.

In addition to human sources, Qatar has requested the cargo of tools and might “expressing extra wants” in October 2022, a couple of weeks earlier than the first launch.

If no member current of the Renaissance group or its allies (MoDem and Horizons) opposed the textual content, the Nupes and National Rally teams voted towards it. The Les Républicains group didn’t take part for the most half in the vote.

What do the opponents of this settlement accuse?

The Nupes teams brazenly attacked this worldwide settlement, recalling particularly the working situations of the employees on a number of events “quasi-slaves” for the development of stadiums. “In ten years, 6,500 overworked employees have died on the development website. Under each garden there’s a cemetery!”so launched PS chief Olivier Fauré when his rebellious colleague Louis Boyard questioned: “How to play ball on a pile of corpses?”

“Diplomacy can also be the alerts we ship, the steadiness of energy we create, the eyes we do not shut when fundamental human rights are flouted.

Olivier Fauré

to the National Assembly

On the half of the National Rally, we have been additionally moved by the contempt for human rights in the Kingdom of Qatar. “Everyone is sitting contentedly on human rights” for “a couple of extra billion”, Caroline Parmentier denounced. Finally, a number of MEPs criticized “environmental scandal” it represents the group of this World Cup, closely criticized for the development of quite a few air-conditioned stadiums.

Nothing unacceptable to the authorities or the majority. On franceinfo, Karl Olive, MP for Yvelines, stated: “It’s not about being the ambassador of Qatar, now not a prosecutor”.

Even higher, for Amelia Lakrafi, this partnership is a chance to “shield the pursuits of France, promote the affect of French experience and guarantee the safety of guests”. The Majority MP assured that points of human rights compliance or carbon footprint have been addressed.

“Hosting the World Cup led Qatar to make vital progress”, notably “eradicating the kafala, which stipulated that overseas employees had to be positioned beneath guardianship” or “establishing a minimal wage for unskilled overseas employees”.

Amelia Lakraffey

to the National Assembly

A ultimate line of criticism: the current incidents at the Stade de France, talked about by a number of MPs.

Is this a novel deal?

No. Foreign Trade and Attractiveness Minister Olivier Becht described “security” sporting occasions reminiscent of “robust axis” bilateral cooperation between France and Qatar. He recalled two precedents particularly: the 2006 Asian Games and the 2021 Arab Cup of Nations.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.