Cognac: Martell under threat of 500,000 euro fine
VS.A fine of 5 million euros. This is critical, even in phrases of the annual turnover of Martell & Co, which has exceeded 600 million euros. Requests from prosecutor Alice Bojolo at this Wednesday’s corrective listening to. This has severe implications for …
VS.A fine of 5 million euros. This is critical, even in phrases of the annual turnover of Martell & Co, which has exceeded 600 million euros. Requests from prosecutor Alice Bojolo at this Wednesday’s corrective listening to. This has severe penalties for the picture. “ Confusing enterprise observe “Resistance says matter.” Traceability Between 2015 and 2020 on two vintages marketed overseas, particularly in Asia. And 500,000 euros, the revenue made by this nearly cognac home. 7,000 bottles out of 30 million “necks” bought yearly by the Martinet model, 99% for export. The story may have led to a transaction. Myrtle refuses. When the corporate’s Parisian lawyer utilized for launch on the listening to, it may imply a confession.
At the middle of the controversy are two “classic” home productions. It shouldn’t be a mix, it’s fairly uncommon in cognac. It is a single eau-de-vie, produced and processed within the course of. ” A distinct segment market “To symbolize the Martel House, in keeping with Patricia Gaborio, Head of Legal Affairs. A 1978 miniature champagne cognac and a 1989 grand champagne, produced by two wine producers ” Myrtle’s historic and dependable accomplice “Prosecution for Consumers” Rich “, Ready to maintain 145 euros for classic 89, 314 for 78. A presentation in English solely on the model’s worldwide website. This is the place Directe, the Department of Population Protection and Fraud Prevention, noticed the bottles. Wanted to check the traceability of the product. Producers are being pressured Either approach “
Question of rationalization
The administration has checked. It was thought of that the components produced by Martel had been “insufficient”. The outcome is a large file and questions. The inventory of eau-de-vie that denies the share of angels by growing from one yr to the subsequent, the barrels that we observe however not their content material, the controversy round Cellar’s hygrometry, the carbon 14 conflict and Ux’s relationship DV, classic Or speak in regards to the age of alcohol. There can be a authorized battle, primarily based on the deserves of the lawsuit when the product was just for overseas nations, a protection that argues that classic high quality shouldn’t be an argument when Martel takes delight in promoting distinctive merchandise. “Text Interpretation Questions”, Defense legal professionals speculate, François Voiron and Laura Castex. Jean-Philippe Dougas, anti-fraud inspector, however maintained his suspicions and directed “ Inconsistency “The reply, from Martell, is to share shares which prohibit their tracing, within the absence of data, whereas protection winegrowers are primarily based on distillers’ notebooks.
For simplicity, “ It might be an alcohol, you’ll be able to’t show it, so that you’re violating “It could also be applicable for the prosecution, who had been extra within the commerce than in selling the fear.” There, we don’t have a closed barrel till marketed 7, resembling small homes make classic cognac. 500,000 euros and a publication in a nationwide newspaper and a particular journal, it was the fitting worth. “Except for the defendant’s legal professionals, who’ve been appointed in a particular authorized case and condemned.” A prosecution investigation that has the incorrect motive. There is not any unfair commerce observe, no impact on the buyer “, For mee Franোয়াois Vyron.
Judgment on 26 September.